Vol. 79, March 2011

Comparison of Nasal Resistance and Flow in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients and Controls

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Comparison of Nasal Resistance and Flow in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients and Controls,SAMEH M. AMIN and KHALED H. ABD EL-MAGID

 

 Abstract
Background: The pathophysiology of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is not well understood. Respiration affects the status of upper and lower esophageal sphincters.
Objective: We compared nasal airway resistance and flow during respiration in LPR patients and controls to detect a possible correlation.
Methods: Total nasal resistance (TNR) and sum of flow (SF) of 25 LRP patients and 25 controls without LPR was measured with active anterior rhinomanometry. Gastrointestinal and otolaryngological symptoms, severity and duration were assessed according to visual analog scale. Patients were subjected to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, nasendoscopy and flexible pharyngolaryngoscopy.
Results: LPR patients had before decongestion statistically significant lower TNR (0. 15; p-value: 0.008) and higher SF (547; p-value: 0.004) and after decongestion TNR (0.10; p-value: 0.002) and SF (762; p-value: 0.003) at 75 Pascal compared to controls. Decongestion decreased non significantly (p-value: 0.66) TNR in controls (27.2%) less than in LPR group (28%). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed SF >450 increases likelihood of LPR 5 times (95% confidence interval: 1.6-19.2) compared to those having SF <450.
Conclusion: Our results supports that relatively lower TNR and higher SF are associated with LPR. If this is con-firmed in larger group of LPR patients, it will contribute to better understanding of LPR pathophysiology. This may allow also partial explanation of CPAP anti reflux effect. Controlled reduction of TNR by nasal surgery might be needed to avoid disruption of this newly discovered anti reflux barrier.

 

Show full text

Copyright © 2014. All Rights Reserved.
Designer and Developer 
EXPERT WEB SOLUTIONS        0020 1224757188